Join us as we unbox the “Futuristic” themed July box from Loot Crate! Lots of great stuff from Star Trek to Valiant comics!
Also, check out our original Loot Crate review article here!
Well, we’re launching this unboxing video a lot later than we wanted due to some unforeseen technical issues, but hey… better late than never! This was a particularly excellent 1Up box, with and exciting Survival theme, so check out our video below, and make sure to head over to 1UpBox.com to sign yourself up and get one of your own!
And also make sure to check out our first 1Up unboxing video and “Is It Worth It?” article here:
There are a lot of monthly subscription boxes out there full of great swag for geeks and gamers, but how many of them are actually worth the price? We recently received a 1Up Box and dug through it to find out if it’s worth the roughly $13 (plus $7 shipping & handling). This is their May box and the theme was RPG. Check out what all we got in the box below, with actual pictures that we took of the items (not stock photos), and our estimated value based on what we could find comparable to each item.
World of Warcraft, Sylvanas Pop Vinyl Figure – $11
This is the only item in the box that isn’t an exclusive. This figure runs on Amazon for about $11.
1Up Buddies “Furry Assassins” T-Shirt – $15
This item is harder to determine an outside value than the POP figure is, because it’s something that’s 100% exclusive to 1Up. I found someone selling this shirt on Ebay for about $15, with free shipping, so that’s what we’re gonna go with.
Just with these two items you’re already over in value compared to what you pay for the box with S&H included, and there’s still more…
Viking Pin – $5
This viking pin will remind you a little of the Dragonborn from Skyrim, and I wasn’t able to find any other pins that were similar to this, but I did find someone selling this pin on Ebay for $5.
Vault Bookmark – $2
You’ll recognize this as an homage to the Fallout game series. It’s stylized like the pause/save screen featuring the Vault Boy. This was another one that I could not find a similar item for, but I did find this Vault Boy bookmark on Etsy for close just under $2, so since this is an exclusive I’m gonna round the value up to $2 even.
Assassin’s Creed Emoji Stickers – $5
These are great, right? They just crack me up. I found these on Ebay for $5 and that seems fair considering they’re also a 1Up exclusive item.
So there you have it folks. All added up, per our research, you get almost $40 worth of great stuff for only spending about $20, making it entirely worth the price. The 1Up Box theme for June is Survival so go to 1Upbox.com to get one sent right to your door, and check out our unboxing video below!
When most people think about Nashville, comedy is not likely to be high in the list of things they’d associate with the Tennessee capital. “Music City”, the official(?) moniker, brings to mind country music and Gibson guitars more than stand-up and improv comedy. Well, there are two guys who don’t think it has be that way and they’re doing something about it. Luke Watson and Scott Field are the founders of Third Coast Comedy. Together, they have almost 3 decades of experience in improv and sketch comedy and they’re using their knowledge and accumen to create a space, the Third Coast Comedy Club, where other creative comedic minds can hone their skills, and where if you just really love to watch sketch and improv comedy you can do that too! Check out my interview with them below!
4LN – How did you each initially get into comedy and improv?
Luke Watson: I think I’ve always been “into” comedy. Its always been my favorite genre of movie/tv shows and whenever someone asked me for a role-model it wasn’t uncommon for a comedian to be the first to come to mind. When it comes to improv, I was doing it with friends in college before I even knew it was a performance art form. I knew the show “Whose Line is it Anyway?” existed but I had no idea that there was an improv culture that existed and regularly performed at venues all across the country. When I moved back to Atlanta after college a friend of mine who was performing at Dad’s Garage Theater introduced me to an independent improv team and before I knew it I was on stage performing with them.
Scott Field: I credit my family of origin! I HAD to be lighthearted growing up in the dark, depressing alcoholic fueled Central Pennsylvania town that I did. I never did theater in high school or college. Instead, my first comedy troop was made up of all the guys on the cross country teams I ran with. In my mid 20s I took some classes at improv Boston, auditioned, and then performed with their main stage cast for several years.
4LN – What, or who, would you say were your biggest comedy influences growing up?
Luke: I’ve always been all across the board with my favorite comedians: Carol Burnett, Robin Williams, Zach Galifianakis, Ellen Degeneres, Demitri Martin, Jim Carrey. Then of course the SNL folks: Tina Fey, Amy Poehler, Chris Farley, Rachel Dratch, and Will Ferrell. Each of those people are on there for a different reason. Whether is was Jim Carrey’s lack of fear or judgement as he played a character at a 12 on a 10 scale, Ellen Degeneres’ and Zach Galifinakis’ ability to deliver a joke. Demitri Martin’s style. Robin Williams physicality and energy. Carol Burnett’s originality and eternal relevancy. Most of those comedians still make my current top 10 list.
Scott: The guys on the teams I was a part of, for sure. I love listening to Bill Cosby, Robin Williams, Steve Martin, watching Saturday night live, Monty Python, SCTV…
4LN – You both started out elsewhere and then came to Nashville later. Was there anything in particular that drew you here to further pursue your comedy careers?
Luke: I didn’t move here for the comedy–and didn’t move here for music, either. I moved her to be closer to my sister and brother. But then the improv ‘itch’ started and I couldn’t help but get back into it. I started with a local troupe and shortly thereafter decided to start LOL Nashville and focus on long-form improvisation (going back to my Atlanta days).
Scott: My career has been in teaching, not comedy. What drew me to Nashville was the lifestyle and affordability. The city has been very open too and it’s supportive of my own comedic interests.
4LN – What do you say to people who are unconvinced, or surprised, that Nashville has such a thriving and evolved comedy scene?
Luke: I’d say they’re not getting out of the house enough. The fact is, its getting to the point where its hard to not notice it. There is literally some form of comedy performed on any given night of any given month in this city–often times several opportunities on the same night. Live comedy has taken a presence in every corner of this city from bars and music venues, to coffee houses and restaurants. Once the Third Coast Comedy Club launches it will be hard to find someone who is unconvinced that the comedy scene here is thriving.
Scott: I would say that I am not surprised. Unless you know someone directing or doing shows, or really look for a comedy, it is in fact hard-to-find. Overtime that has been less and less the case. With our venue, it will be impossible NOT to find comedy with a local flavor in the local cast.
4LN – You’ve launched a Kickstater project to help get your comedy club off the ground, but it really is so much more than just a typical comedy club. Can you tell us about Third Coast Comedy Club and your vision for it?
Luke: Our vision in one word can be summed up with: community. Whether it be the sense of community involved in the conception, production, and casting of shows to the stage design and bar atmosphere, this club will be the place that local comics will not only want to produce their shows or grab some stage time, it will also be a place where they’ll go to grab a drink with other comedians or go to write the last pages of the script for a sketch their working on. What makes me so excited about the club is the vision for the shows. Third Coast Comedy will be different than many other comedy clubs in that it won’t be dedicated to just one form of comedy. We will regularly have sketch, improv, stand-up, comedic plays, variety shows, experimental shows, etc. It will be nice for someone to have what may seem like a crazy concept and have a chance to try it out in an actual theater.
Scott: This will be, simply put, a venue designed for improv and sketch comedy produced by people who live in Nashville. We want audiences to be able to easily find us, enjoy their time at the club, and return again and again because of the positive vibe, comfortable, welcoming feel, and funny shows. It has to be a fun place to be for people buying tickets and for people performing. We really want to encourage people to take nutty ideas and bring them out into the world. We are going to be the birthing center for local comedy, and that means there’ll be a placenta, but we’re comedy doctors, so we’ll clean that up. Natural comedy birth, so no epidurals. Sorry.
4LN – These next questions are for our “lightning round.” Just answer with the first thing that comes to mind. All-time favorite comedy album…
Luke: That’s very tough. But I’m gonna have to go with Zach Galifianakis, Live At The Purple Onion, even though to my knowledge its only on DVD and was never made into a CD album.
Scott: Paul F. Tomkins Freak Wharf
4LN – Where’s the best place to eat in Nashville, and what’s the best thing to get there?
Luke: Hattie B’s. Great hot chicken–just be careful. They’re not messing around with their hot sauces. Seriously. I won’t even go beyond the Hot. Honestly, I normally get the medium. OH! And don’t forget to save room for their Banana Pudding is ah-mazing.
Scott: I love Batter’d N Fried. A lot. I’m a veggie, so I get the veggie sushi and beer. I also consume Boston Red Sox games as the place is modeled on a Boston pub.
4LN – What was the last concert you went to?
Luke: When I go out to listen to music its typically to hear a local band play. I think my last concert was almost a year ago (can’t believe its been that long!) at Bonnaroo (which by the way, Mumford and Sons killed it).
Scott: Neil Young a few weeks ago at Ascend. First time there. Awesome!
4LN – This will be tough, because there a lot of them, but name for me one other local comedian that you think everyone should know about…
Luke: Well, you’ve done it again…making me narrow a lot of great options into one answer. And you’re right, there’s a lot of them. But I’d say Dusty Slay. He’s got an original brand and his material is solid and polished. Check out his “Makin’ That Fudge” album. You know its good when you’re still laughing when listening the third time around.
Scott: I like Brad Pendergast (Brad Edwards). He’s so impatient and miffed and dirty. It’s a nice combination. Plus, he tries to spill hot coffee on me sometimes which is so funny.
4LN – Finally, since we are a “nerd” blog, what comic book character, or characters, do you think would be great at improv? (Personally, I feel like Deadpool and Plastic Man could nail it.)
Luke: When it comes to humor, Deadpool would be a great option. But I think Iron Man would be a great improviser, as well. His ability to make something from very little and without any preparation. Also, I love his sarcasm.
Scott: Groot, from Guardians of the Galaxy.
I want to send a huge THANK YOU to Luke and Scott for chatting with me! Make sure that you check out their Kickstarter campaign and please seriously consider contributing, especially if you live in or around Nashville. If you’re interested in supporting Third Coast and you also happen to be looking for something to do this weekend, check out this awesome fundraiser show at 12th & Porter on Sunday night!
If you are anything like me, sometimes it can be hard to stay focused at work. If you work on a computer all day long like I do, it can be mentally exhausting to do the same thing day in and day out. Over the last few months I have been fortunate enough to be able to leave my beige-walled cubicle and start working from home at my real job, which has been fantastic. For the most part I’ve been able to stay around the same level production-wise, but I was expecting to be able to get more done now that I am away from my colleagues that like to stop by and talk, or the over-the-cubicle-wall talk about the Jackson 5 or listening to older ladies discuss Miley Cyrus (both of which happened occasionally).
It didn’t take long for me to realize that the distractions found at home are way better than those found in the nondescript cubicle farm where I still go one day a week. I had to set up my desk in the bedroom because the only extra room in the house was between the living room and play room, and I didn’t feel like getting pummeled by our three year old who thinks he’s both a Ninja Turtle and a Power Ranger every five minutes. You know what else is in the bedroom? A bed, a TV, whatever books I am currently reading, and a window to the world outside (mostly a view of my shed, but what can you do). That is four things I never had to worry about at work. The only TV we have at the office is in the basement and plays the Andy Griffith Show and the Price is Right on and endless loop and at an unbelievable volume. Seriously, the show choices and the insane volume is like being at my Granpa’s house when I was a kid. My production at work hadn’t dropped per se, but it wasn’t where I wanted it to be. I needed something that could get focused on my work, while also staving off the constant cycle of burnout.
Enter the Pomodoro technique!
The interestingly named Pomodoro technique is a productivity system that promises to help you eliminate distractions, avoid burnout (burnout is a major drag), and create a better work/life balance. The user sets a timer – Francesco Cirillo
Now let’s get into the system itself.
Each Pomodoro takes 30 minutes total – 25 minutes of work and 5 minutes of play. After all, “All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.” (is that reference still relevant? I assume people still read and/or watch The Shining). Once you complete your 25 minutes of focused work, a check mark is made on a notepad, and you are now free to do something completely separate from your work, whether it be a walk, stretching, straightening up the house, or, I don’t know, finally thinking of that witty comeback you wish you would’ve said to Gary last night… but seriously, spend 3-5 minutes completely disengaged from your work. After the break you reset the timer and get back to work. After four Pomodoro’s you then give yourself a 15-30 minute break.
“That’s a lot of breaks!?” the middle-manager in you might say.
Here’s the thing, since your 25 minutes are meant to be hyper-focused on work, you are actually likely to get more done than you would were you just to do your normal routine of interspersing work with browsing the internet, going to get coffee, or catching up with the few colleagues that you actually enjoy being around until you get your fifteen minute break. I have only been using this technique for a week or two, but I can go back and look at my production levels and there is a significant difference between by pre-Pomodoro work style. I was honestly surprised by the amount of improvement between my already decent numbers and my productivity using this system. Please note: I am not trying to Billy Mays you into trying this technique. I am legitimately interested in what works, and, as of now, this technique is on fleek (I have no idea if I used that right… I am dreadfully boring).
It also appears that the technique delivers on its promise to manage burnout and eliminate distractions, as far as I am concerned. Knowing your next break is always less than 25 minutes away makes it easier to keep your mind on the task at hand. It also helped me eliminate my random Facebook/Google News browsing, because it’s easier to convince yourself to block out those distractions knowing you will get your chance when you are in your 5 minute work hiatus. Throughout my Pomodoro trial run, I’ve noticed a significant increase in my focus and production, while experiencing a marked decrease in pretty much all of the common distractions found in both cubicle land and at the work-at-home office.
If you are interested in working smarter and increasing your output, while still getting time to mentally reboot and feel refreshed, the Pomodoro technique is definitely for you. If you decide to give it a go you can get more details at their official website here! Let us know in the comments how this technique works for you if you decide to try it out!
If you’re reading this then you already know that the brilliant and beloved Alan Rickman has passed away. Reports say that Rickman lost a battle to cancer and peacefully went to that big Nakatomi Plaza in the sky. For most people from my generation, Rickman will always be most fondly remembered as Severus Snape, the brooding and intimidating Hogwarts professor with a reluctant and unassuming heart of gold. For the people just above my generation he’ll always be Hans Gruber, the cunning and ruthless German terrorist who helped introduce us to the best blue-collar action hero the world has ever seen, John McClane. And since everywhere else you read about the wonderful life of Mr. Rickman will likely only focus on these two roles of his, I’d like to talk about a few of his other fantastic work.
The first time I remember seeing Alan Rickman was in the Kevin Costner Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves film. As a kid, I LOVED that movie. I used to watch it all the time. As an adult, I realize… Costner maybe isn’t the best Robin Hood. However, Rickman’s portrayal of the despicable but humorously exasperated Sheriff of Nottingham is still one of the standout performances in that film. The Sheriff is a jerk, but Rickman almost gets you on his side for brief moments, due to the way you almost relate to his frustrations.
The next time I was captivated by Rickman wasn’t until about 8 years later. The film was Dogma. Written and directed by Kevin Smith, the film is about a woman who discovers that she is the final bloodline relative of Jesus Christ and is the only person who can save the universe from being obliterated. That movie made a very big impact on me in terms of my understanding and perception of religion and belief, and Rickman’s role as the Metatron, the Voice of God, played a big part in that. At one point in the film, the main character Bethany breaks down and says that she’s not capable of taking on the responsibility that’s fallen on her. At that point, Rickman delivers this monologue as only he could’ve…
That’s what Jesus said. Yes, I had to tell him. And you can imagine how that hurt the Father – not to be able to tell the Son Himself because one word from His lips would destroy the boy’s frail human form? So I was forced to deliver the news to a scared child who wanted nothing more than to play with other children. I had to tell this little boy that He was God’s only Son, and that it meant a life of persecution and eventual crucifixion at the hands of the very people He came to enlighten and redeem. He begged me to take it back, as if I could. He begged me to make it all not true. And I’ll let you in on something, Bethany, this is something I’ve never told anyone before… If I had the power, I would have.
That fell very heavy on me, and I’m convinced that no other actor could have inserted the intensity and emotion into it that Rickman did. The man was a master of his craft.
Immediately following Dogma, Rickman joined the ensemble comedy, Galaxy Quest, which has become something of a cult-classic in nerd culture. His portrayal of Alexander Dane, a true thespian who’s resentful that his most notable work is as “Dr. Lazarus” on the cancelled sci-fi show for which the film is named. He again, doing as Rickman did best, plays a very hilariously frustrated character, who doesn’t want much. Just the respect that he feels he deserves.
The final film I’d like to mention, was a role for Rickman that was maybe his most down-to-earth performance ever. Love, Actually. I know, I know. It’s a “romantic comedy” and you very likely don’t even respect it’s existence. Well, you can go to hell becasue I actually love that movie. (See what I did there?)
Rickman plays Harry, the director of a design company who becomes gradually seduced by his secretary, as he drifts further and further away from his wife, played by Emma Thompson. Their interactions in the film become more and more difficult to watch as you see his whor… I mean… his “lady of the evening” secretary persuade him futher and further into an unseen, but clearly not imaginary, affair. He painfully captures the sincerity of someone who knows what they’re doing is wrong but keeps doing it anyway. The layers that exist in that character are, in my opinion, the most complex ones to be found in a film that, arguably, has more depth than you think it does. You can thank Alan Rickman for that.
Alan Rickman was a truly brilliant actor. He could be menacing in ways that would make your skin crawl, but he could also make you laugh out loud with his dry and slightly bitter sense of humor. He could seamlessly flow from drama, to action, to fantasy, to comedy, and even do all four at once if need be. No role was too small that he couldn’t make it the most captivating performance you’d see in that entire film, and no role was too big that you’d tire of him. His artful presence will be sorely missed.
It’s the New Year, and that means everyone is either psyching themselves up to try to make themselves better people, or busy telling everyone they can find that New Year’s Resolutions are pointless. Sure there is some middle-ground in there somewhere, but it’s pretty slim. For me, my hope is to become more content with where I am in life, and quit looking to the next step.
One thing that is becoming more and more common in our society is something called “status anxiety.” Status anxiety is fear of being less-than because others around you have more. I definitely see this trait in myself, and I am working hard to fix it. After reading a few books on the subject, I became bored with the droll, nonfiction accounts of status anxiety and began my semiannual reading of The Lord of the Rings. It’s funny how different mindsets play in to one’s interpretation of what they are reading. While reading the introduction there exists an almost total antithesis of status anxiety in the story’s lore. Sometimes the best advice we can find is that found in the stories we love. I find that pop culture, in general, allows us to explore different ideals with more clarity than most give it credit.
Now, obviously there is a strong sense of epic mythological adventure in The Lord of the Rings – there is a reason that it is one of the most popular fantasy series out there – but I want to look at something a little smaller in scope — both literally and metaphorically. For today’s article I’d like to look at how the simplistic lifestyle of the Hobbits might help inform us on how better to live our lives, especially in the always-connected, hectic lifestyle in which most of us find ourselves.
“In a hole in the ground there lived a hobbit. Not a nasty, dirty, wet hole, filled with the ends of worms and an oozy smell, nor yet a dry, bare, sandy hole with nothing in it to sit down on or to eat: it was a hobbit-hole, and that means comfort.” ~ The Hobbit
Both The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings center on the adventures of Bilbo and his nephew Frodo, and through these books we can get several glimpses of Hobbit culture. Outside of a few notable outliers, two of which were just mentioned, the Shire-folk tend to value the simple things — good stories, good food, and good friends top the list — while more adventurous endeavors and loud behavior are generally frowned upon. Really, besides the Sacksville-Bagginses, we see very little covetous behavior in Hobbit culture. In fact, it appears that their lack of status anxiety is the key reason Frodo was so resilient to the pull of the One Ring. Sméagol immediately covets the Ring, going so far as to kill his good friend to obtain it, and then spend the entire story trying to rebooting his precious, where Frodo’s immediate reaction is to reject the Ring and give it to Gandalf. “The excesses of Hobbits,” David Day notes in Tolkien: a Dictionary, “were limited to dressing in bright colours and consuming six substantial meals a day.” In fact, it appears that Hobbits that preferred to wealth above all us are generally considered assholes — looking at you, Sacksville-Bagginses.
“There is more in you of good than you know, child of the kindly West. Some courage and some wisdom, blended in measure. If more of us valued food and cheer and song above hoarded gold, it would be a merrier world.” ~ The Hobbit
There also exists in Tolkien’s tales a sense of technophobia, meaning that the heroes often work in concert with nature, while the villains use more advanced technology to destroy nature and to create twisted versions of natural things; Orcs, for example, are thought to have once been Elves that were twisted into unnatural, evil creatures by Melkor, the villain of The Silmarillion and Sauron’s master. We see a stark difference between the lively Shire with the fire and destruction of Mordor and Isengard.
Full disclosure, it would be hypocritical of me to say that I am a technophobe – after all, I am writing this on a laptop listening to Pandora on an Xbox One – but in a culture in which we can be continually connected to everything everywhere, maybe we could use a chance to unplug occasionally. The Hobbits frequently go on long walks, enjoy good books, and like few things more than a good meal, a good beer, and a table of friends. It’s a running, albeit irritating and ironic, trend on social media to portray society (especially millennials) as completely absorbed in our devices. I wouldn’t go so far as to say completely absorbed, but I know that I am guilty of checking my News Feed or reading articles when I could be enjoying the company I find myself with.
One of the most pervasive examples of Hobbit culture throughout The Lord of the Rings is that of Mr. Samwise Gamgee (who we’ve already argued is the true hero of The Lord of the Rings). His loyalty to his friends is the only reason he leaves the Shire, and the whole time he’s gone he looks forward to being home. Even after seeing the splendor of Rivendell and Lothlórien, Sam dreams of a simple life in the Shire. This shows that one can appreciate the courage and goodness found in epic stories, even to the point where it stymies one’s own courage to face unexpected fears (like Shelob, spider-child of Ungoliant), but still find the joy in time spent with good food, beer, and friends.
The holiday season is in full swing and while you’re out rushing around buying gifts for all your loved ones, remember that there are many less fortunate people out there who won’t be having such a full and joyful time. For this reason, our goof friends over at ComicCollectorLive.com have kicked off their annual Christmas Fundraiser. 100% of the proceeds from this fundraiser will go to purchase toys for the children of Vanderbilt Children’s Hospital.
They have close to $800 at this time, and with only 10 days to go, it’s gonna be really close hitting their goal.
You can get more info here: CCL MARATHON CHRISTMAS FUNDRAISER 2015
And, if you feel so inclined, you can make a contribution via PayPal by sending a donation to CCL4KIDS@COMICCOLLECTORLIVE.COM
Come on nerds! Get out there and help some kids have a holly jolly holiday!
Throughout history, from the Greek myths to Star Wars and beyond, there are common threads that run through a majority of humanity’s heroic tales. Regardless of the cultural context, time period, or which particular hero, there are certain elements that seem to always appear in these myths. Joseph Campbell, an American mythologist, calls this the “monomyth,” or the “hero’s journey.”
George Lucas’ Star Wars is steeped in myth. While writing Star Wars, Lucas became fascinated with Joseph Campbell’s book on myth and heroic archetypes The Hero with a Thousand Faces. While not necessarily the basis of his story, he was certainly influenced by his obsession with the monomyth. You can see elements of this theory throughout the saga, but especially in Luke’s journey from boyhood to Jedi-hood.
Traditionally, the hero’s journey has 17 individual stages, which we will look at in-depth a little bit further down. Not all hero’s necessarily experience all 17 stages during their journey, and oftentimes these stages appear in a different order depending on the story. These events, however, are relatively persistent throughout the history of human storytelling.
Below we will look at each stage of the hero’s journey and how we see this mythological journey play out in the Star Wars universe. Fair warning, this article is a bit longer than… well, than anything else we’ve put out. I tried to shorten it, but there isn’t really a spot to split this article into two parts.
You can see that these stages of the Hero’s Journey occur multiple times throughout the films. Despite the obvious homages to Cambell’s theory, Lucas does include personal flourishes that give the story additional depth. For instance, one of the most iconic images in Star Wars is when Luke stares off into the twin sunset of Tatooine. This imagery conjures up a sense that nothing will ever be the same, that this might be Luke’s last moment of innocence. Additionally, the score by John Williams provides us with a sense of awe and urgency – that this journey is increasingly important.
Another key area where Lucas diverges from Cambell is that in Campbell’s idea of myth, the hero is the sole focus of the story and other characters are merely a means to an end. The side characters are just tools to help in the maturation and growth of the hero. Lucas, however, focuses on how the struggles faced by the hero are just as real to all of the other characters involved. The fate of the entire galaxy is at stake, and all of the characters are vital to the success of the hero’s mission. This idea can be seen in all of the movies, but especially in Return of the Jedi when the destruction of the second Death Star relies on Han and Leia leading a strike force to disable the shield generator, Luke to bring take on Vader and Sheev, and the entire Rebel Fleet to fight through overwhelming numbers to try to destroy the reactor core of the Death Star. In fact, it seems that all of the redemptive moments in the saga occur specifically through social relationships, and these in turn help the hero develop. In fact, the only true individualists we see in the saga are the Sith who use everyone as a means to their own end.
Most myths, including Star Wars, are fantasy, but this does not mean it is simply mindless entertainment. By relegating it to that status, we ignore the potential for learning and growth that myth provides. The Star Wars universe is alien to our own, but this allows us to view our cultures problems through the lens of our popular culture. This, in turn, encourages us to reflect on the moral issues presented through the fantasy setting, thus allowing us to think on these issue in a way we might not have been able to any other way.
Over the past week or so, theories have been floating around the internet that 1) Luke Skywalker actually turned to the dark side at the end of Return of the Jedi, and 2) Kylo Ren, the new masked villain from Star Wars: the Force Awakens, is actually Luke Skywalker. For some reason, these theories have made me much angrier than they should have. I am not going to say that I spent days stewing over how ridiculous these theories are, but I’m not NOT going to say that either. In fact, as soon as I read these theories I immediately messaged my friend Jeff from the Imperial Talker (the Kenobi to my Luke), and made sure I wasn’t taking crazy pill. It bothered me so much I decided to offer a counterarguments as to why Luke Skywalker did not (and should not) fall to the dark side and, therefore, could not (and should not) be Kylo Ren. Instead of just going on an angry internet rant, I will instead try to provide logical counter-arguments to both claims, because I believe in civil discourse.
Let’s look at the theory that Luke fell to the dark side in Return of the Jedi first. I read this theory in an opinion piece posted at Huffington Post (if you’d like to read it in it’s entirety, click here). The idea is that Luke did not actually turn away from the dark side as it appears in the film, but, instead, gave himself to the dark side in order to save his friends and defeat the Vader and Emperor Sheev Palpatine.
The author begins his argument at the Tree Cave in Empire Strikes Back. In the film, Luke enters the Tree Cave fastening his weapon belt (much to the chagrin of Yoda) and in a trippy, slow-motion scene in which he encounters Vader, ignites his lightsaber and beheads him to reveal that it is actually his own face under the helmet (Mindfreak!?). The author believes that this is foreshadowing Luke’s own fall to the Dark Side. I, on the other hand, feel it is more of a symbolic warning to Luke that if he isn’t careful he will make the same mistakes his father did.
He then uses the following quote issued from Yoda to Luke as he sets off to save his friends to show that Yoda has already predicted Luke’s fall:
Only a fully trained Jedi Knight, with the Force as his ally, will conquer Vader and his emperor. If you end your training now… if you choose the quick and easy path as Vader did… you will become an agent of evil.
But what he leaves out is the second part of the conversation in which Yoda says this to Luke:
Strong is Vader. Mind what you have learned. Save you it can.
Yoda is still giving Luke advice on how to defeat Vader and not stray to the dark side, which would be pointless if Yoda was 100% certain that Luke leaving Dagobah would inherently lead to his fall. Earlier in Empire Strikes Back, when Luke asks Yoda if his friends will die on Cloud City, Yoda responds saying, “Difficult to see. Always in motion is the future.” Yoda can and does make sound judgements throughout the saga, but he cannot predict the future because it is constantly in a state of flux. He and Ben also tell Luke that the only way to defeat Vader is to kill him because there is no good left in Vader. Luke, however, proves both of them wrong on this point, but we will get back into that farther down the page. My point is, Luke’s failure at the cave is part of Luke’s “Road of Trials” and doesn’t necessitate his fall. These are learning moments in the hero’s journey (another article on that in the works) that allow for growth towards the hero’s ultimate “apotheosis.”
The next part of the article centers on Luke’s change of character in Return of the Jedi. This movie shows us a much darker Luke than we are accustomed to seeing. When two Gamorean guards attempt to bar is entrance to Jabba’s throne room, Luke sends them scrambling back to the wall clutching their throats with a subtle wave of his hand. Using the Force Choke is obviously not a behavior we would expect of a Jedi. He is also pretty quick to cut down any of Jabba’s cronies that stand in his way in order to save his friends. I believe that this does hint that Luke is slowly beginning to be pulled to the dark side (there is a great article on the seduction of the dark side over at Imperial Talker).
Later in the film, Luke is goaded into trying to strike the Emperor down in hatred. Luke does indeed show that he is on a slippery slope to full on dark side. In the final duel between Vader and Luke, Luke constantly struggle between continuing to fight and trying to draw his father back to the good. Eventually Vader tries to draw Luke out of hiding by threatening his sister Leia. This drives Luke into a rage and he relentlessly attacks Vader until he cuts off his hand and towers over him about to deliver the final strike. This attack was almost certainly fueled by anger and fear, which again suggests Luke is toeing the line of the dark side. The author suggests that Luke giving into his anger proves he hasn’t been a good guy at all in Return of the Jedi. Instead, he believes, Luke failed his Jedi training and is not able to withstand the power of Vader. The following quote is directly from the article:
When I first saw this scene as a kid I remember being completely confused. I thought that of course Luke turned — but only a little bit. After all, he needed the power from the dark side to beat his dad… right? And he acted like a complete maniac but it was only temporary and phew! he came back from the edge!
This, people, is a plot hole. It doesn’t make any sense in terms of the story and also Luke’s character. It doesn’t follow Luke’s motivation at all because he quite clearly doesn’t have any motivation to stay a good guy. He’s just seen what he could do with his dark powers (defeat the bad guys, save people).
Let me first address his point that Luke has failed his Jedi training. If we look at the final scene between Luke and Yoda, which I will quote directly out of the annotated screenplay) we see this conversation:
Luke: Master Yoda, you can’t die.
Yoda: Strong am I in the Force… but not that strong! Twilight is upon me, and soon night must fall. That is the way of things… the way of the Force
Luke: But I need your help. I’ve come back to complete the training.
Yoda: No more training do you require. Already know you that which you need.
Yoda sighs, lying back on the beck
Luke: Then I am a Jedi.
Yoda: (shakes his head) Ohhh. Not yet. One thing remains: Vader. You must confront Vader. Then, only then, a Jedi will you be. And confront him you will.
Do you see how that changes things for the author’s theory? Luke did not fail. Vader was his final test, and Luke passes (although it did get a little hairy there for a bit). As Luke is standing over Vader, Luke stops his attack and stares at his fallen father then at his own robotic hand, turns off his lightsaber and tosses it aside. This is not a plot hole. Luke passed the test. While he did rely on fear and anger to overpower Vader, it is the goodness in him that makes him stop and throw away his weapon. Luke tells the Emperor that he has lost and that he is a Jedi like his father before him. Unless he lying (which is what the theory says) Luke is obviously choosing to turn his back on the Dark Side. I am not sure why the author sees this as out of character for Luke. He has been relatively selfless throughout the entire trilogy, always placing the needs of others over his own. Why is that any different than what he did in this instance? He was about to take Vader’s life even though he constantly mentions to both Vader and Kenobi that he senses good in him. This would have been a selfish act unbefitting of a Jedi, but Luke’s selfless personality and the desire to redeem his father snaps him out of his rage and he refuses to finish the task.
My biggest issue with this theory is that if we assume that Luke did in fact turn to the dark side it would ruin the entire point not just the Original Trilogy, but the saga as well. Anakin is the tragic hero who, in an attempt to save the life of the woman he loved, gets ensnared by Dark Lord of the Sith. Luke’s tale, on the other hand, is one of redemption. Luke is tempted to use the dark side just as his father was, but instead of falling as his father did, he is able to resist its pull. In doing so, Luke is able to not only embody the actual return of the Jedi (which is the title of the film, mind you), but he also becomes the catalyst for the redemption of his father.
It also doesn’t make sense in the context of the ending of the film, as well as the recently released four issue miniseries Shattered Empire. If Luke truly did turn to the dark side, why would he then attend the Ewokian celebration on Endor? And remember, Luke was visited by both of his mentors and his father during this celebration. Surely these three would be able to sense if Luke had truly turned evil, right? And in Shattered Empire, which takes place shortly after the end of Return of the Jedi, Luke is still clearly good and serving alongside the Rebels as they attempt to stop the Emperor’s postmortem call for the destruction of several planets as well as put a stop to the remaining Imperial factions throughout the galaxy. In fact, at the end of Shattered Empire Luke and the newly minted Rebel pilot Shera Bey set off on a mission to recover some ancient Jedi relics taken from the Jedi Temple after its destruction. I don’t want to give away spoilers since, unlike Return of the Jedi, Shattered Empire is not thirty years old, but the end of Shattered Empire clearly depicts a Luke that cares for others, which is very unlike the individualistic nature shown by the Sith.
There’s a lot to unpack in that first theory because the source article was itself a long article. I will say that I actually do respect the guy the wrote the first theory. He put a lot of thought into it and backed it up with some quotes (although there are several quotes he left out that sink the theory), but you can tell he’s a big fan of the Wars. Now we will look at the second theory that Luke Skywalker is in fact KYLO REN. This theory, on the other hand, is absurd.
The theory goes something like this: we don’t see Luke Skywalker in the trailer, but what if we did? What if he is actually the masked villain with the fancy, cross-guard lightsaber we see trotting through the snow and looking menacing? Because, why not?
Side note: There’s not a lot of information about the Knights of Ren. What we we know is, the Knights of Ren is an organization that appears to begin shortly after the end of Return of the Jedi. The Ren in Kylo’s name is actually a surname taken on by the members similar to how the Sith used “Darth” as a title, although judging from some of the interviews I’ve read it seems that the Knights aren’t actually Sith Lords. I know it’s confusing for some that the Knights of Ren aren’t Sith. I mean, Kylo wears all black, wields a red lightsaber, and uses the Force… sounds an awful like all of the other Sith we know.
The first problem with this theory is the argument I laid out above. Luke turning to the dark side cheapens the saga and would stand in contrast to Luke’s character throughout the trilogy. If this premise is correct then the possibility of Luke being Kylo plummets to somewhere around 0%, but that’s too easy. As you can see from the 1,600(ish) words above, I overthink these things.
Another problem with this theory is the we already know that Adam Driver is playing Kylo Ren… Some have argued that Driver is a body double for Mark Hamill, but if that’s the case then that’s the worse decision since Senator Binks putting forth the motion to grant Chancellor Palpatine emergency powers. Adam Driver is a really slim, really tall 20-30 something with long black hair and no facial hair. Judging from pictures of Mark Hamill floating around the internet, he’s not exactly String Bean, has a full beard, and definitely does not have black hair. They are about as far apart as you can get from each other as far as body type is concerned. Oh and we’ve already seen pictures of Adam Driver as Kylo Ren sans-mask.
Oh, and we’ve seen some behind the scenes photos of Mark Hamill in full Kenobi-garb:
Lastly, it appears that Kylo Ren is serving under Supreme Leader Snoke, played by Andy Serkis, who heads the First Order. If Luke were actually Kylo Ren, that would mean he would serve under some other guy. Luke was instrumental in defeating the two most feared in the galaxy. He bested Vader in combat, took blasts of Force Lightning like a champ, and is most likely one of the most powerful beings in the galaxy now. Why in the world would he subjugate himself to some other guy we’ve never even heard of? It just doesn’t make any sense.
So, to summarize, for those of you that scrolled to the bottom just to see the conclusion: Luke Skywalker turning to the dark side would cheapen the Original Trilogy, and when you look at all of the evidence doesn’t make any sense. Even worse though, is the idea that Kylo Ren is actually Luke Skywalker. It’s hard for me to express just how absurd that theory is, especially given the reasons I laid out above. I get that people love to theorize about the upcoming Star Wars film, but please at least try to make it fit into the existing continuity.